The Tax Court has issued a ruling favorable to Swiss golfer Sergio Garcia. (If you follow golf, you probably think of him as Spanish, but his residence in Switzerland entitles him to certain tax benefits.) At issue was how much of his TaylorMade endorsement income is subject to U.S. income tax. The payment has to be apportioned between income for personal services and royalty income. A previous decision involving golfer Retief Goosen, who has an endorsement contract with the same manufacturer, allocated the payment 50-50. In this case, the court found reasons to allocate 65% of the payment to royalty income, which escapes U.S. income tax under a tax treaty with Switzerland. More striking, though, is the value of a dynamic personality in the world of golf endorsements. Goosen, who has won the U.S. Open twice, had a contract worth $400,000. Garcia, who has never won a major, commanded a $5.5 million contract. We wonder how much of that figure is ultimately attributable to a single shot Garcia hit in 1999 — golf fans know the one — eyes closed as he struck the ball from a seemigly impossible position behind a tree, then ran out onto the fairway and leaped in the air to see over a mound as the ball sailed onto the green.
Opinion: Garcia v. Commissioner (PDF)