Medicare Tax on Investments: First Look

Taxation of investments will undergo one of its most significant changes ever in 2013, when the Medicare tax is set to begin applying to investment earnings of higher-income individuals. Although this tax is years away, investors and their advisors need to be planning for it now as it will affect strategic decisions they make this year, including Roth conversions and capital gain realizations. Here’s a first look at the new tax.

Background on Medicare tax

The Medicare tax currently applies at the rate of 2.9% to wages and net earnings from self-employment. Employers shoulder half the burden of this tax on wages of their employees; self-employed individuals get to pay the full amount. Unlike social security tax, which applies only up to a limitation known as the wage base (currently $106,800), the Medicare tax applies to an unlimited amount of income within these categories. It has not previously applied to income other than wages and net earnings from self-employment.

Boosting the rate on wages

Beginning in 2013, individuals will pay an additional 0.9% in Medicare tax on wages (or net earnings from self-employment) above $200,000 on a single return, $250,000 on a joint return, or $125,000 if married filing separately. Above those levels, therefore, the overall rate of tax will be 3.8%. In the case of employees, this added tax falls only on the employee, even though the employer continues to pay half the base rate of 2.9%.

Applying the tax to investment income

Here’s the kicker: the new law will also impose a 3.8% Medicare tax on investment income to the extent adjusted gross income (modified to add back excluded foreign income) exceeds the levels just mentioned. Here are some examples of how this would affect different individuals.

  • You’re single, with $170,000 of investment income and no other income. You won’t pay the new Medicare tax on investments because your overall income doesn’t exceed the $200,000 threshold for single taxpayers.
  • You’re single, with $170,000 of investment income and $180,000 of other income. Now your income is $150,000 above the threshold, so you’ll pay this tax on $150,000 of your investment income.
  • You’re married filing jointly with $200,000 of investment income and $280,000 of other income. Your overall income is $230,000 above the $250,000 threshold for married couples, so you’ll pay this tax on all your $200,000 of investment income.

Categories of investment income

Here’s a look at how different categories of investment income will fare under this new tax.

Taxable interest. Taxable interest, currently subject to income tax at rates up to 35%, is likely to be taxed at rates up to 39.6% beginning 2011 when the Bush tax cuts expire. Beginning in 2013, the Medicare tax would take another 3.8%, for a maximum rate of 43.4%.

Capital gains. The top rate on long-term capital gains is currently 15%. This rate is scheduled to revert to 20% in 2011. (It is possible the 15% rate will be retained for taxpayers with income below the levels mentioned earlier.) With the added Medicare tax beginning in 2013, the overall hit would be 23.8%.

Dividends. Qualifying dividends are currently taxed at the same rates that apply to long-term capital gains. Without action by Congress this favorable treatment expires as of the end of 2010, causing the top rate on dividends to leap all the way from 15% now to 39.6% next year and 43.4% two years later. Our crystal ball is cloudy as to whether Congress will step in to prevent this result.

Annuities. The taxable portion of an annuity payout is currently taxed at rates up to 35%. The top rate would change as indicated above for interest income: 39.6% in 2011, and 43.4% when the new Medicare tax applies beginning in 2013. Income from annuities that are provided as part of a qualified retirement plan isn’t treated as investment income for this purpose, though, so it escapes the added 3.8% tax.

Retirement plans. Income from pensions, 401k plans, IRAs and other qualified retirement plans is excluded from the definition of investment income for purposes of this tax. As we saw earlier, however, an increase in your other income can cause you to pay this tax on investment income that would otherwise fall below the threshold amount that applies for your filing status.

In later articles we’ll see how an expectation of paying this tax beginning in 2013 might affect decisions you make this year about strategies such as Roth conversions and capital gains realization.

Tags:

5 Responses to “Medicare Tax on Investments: First Look”

  1. Andy007 says:

    Kaye: you indicated that you would discuss how the new Medicare tax would affect decisions about strategies, and you gave some examples (Roth conversions, cap gains realizations). I would also like your thoughts on accelerating income by exercising NQ stock options early (before the tax increase, even though they don’t expire until after 2012), and deferring income through use of deferred compensation plans (non qualified plans).

    Thanks.

  2. Kaye Thomas says:

    Good idea. These changes will affect various strategies relating to equity compensation. For example, if you’re thinking about avoiding the Medicare tax in connection with an incentive stock option where you plan to hold some of the shares for a year after exercise, you’d want to exercise in 2011 so you can sell in 2012, before the added tax applies beginning in 2013.

  3. cltsiang says:

    Another additional hidden tax for people over 65 is the Part B additional premium. If RMD forces your AGI to be over $170,000, a couple will pay an addtional $1000 (approx.). The next level of AGI is $214,000.
    If your AGI is likely to exceed these levels in future, maybe because of increasing amount of RMI, it maybe worthwhile to convert partial Roth now.
    If your AGI is slightly over $170000, the marginal rate is horrendous. You might as well convert until your AGi is closer to $214000.
    Is my thinking correct?

  4. Kaye Thomas says:

    I expect I’ll write about this in the future. This “tax” can cut either way in a Roth conversion: one person might get hit with the additional premium as a result of income from the conversion, while another might avoid the additional premium by reducing or eliminating required minimum distributions.

  5. cltsiang says:

    I would appreciate if you will write about this additional part B premium, and how it may affect your decision to do Roth conversion. If your AGI increases from $170000 to $170001, that $1 in additional AGI will cost you over $1000 (assuming married couple, over 65).
    I plan to do Roth in 2010 at least to the $170000 level, paying 25% tax. I may even do it to the $214000, paying up to 28%. (The 25% level is going to go to 28% in future anyway). I just have to be careful to stay below AMT level. Complicated life.